|
PUBLIC LIABILITY RISK MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION & RESOURCES
- Brought to you by
Riskex Pty Ltd
SPORT AND RECREATION
Insurance &
Risk Management For Sport and Recreation Organisations
A
Sporting Chance
Risk Management in
Sport
Sporting Facility
Pre
Sporting Event Safety Checklist
Crowd Control in Pubs
Event Management Checklist
QLD Health
Pool & Spa Guide
Bike Parking Facilities
Visitor Risk
Management in National Parks
 Buy
Securely Online |

"They help me to perform
at my optimal level at each session by reducing recovery
time and muscle fatigue."
Craig Stevens - Olympic Swimmer |
 |
NEW! These
compression sports tights are designed with the peak
performance and recovery of athletes in mind. They are
designed by sports professionals to outlast and
outperform existing products whilst always providing
supreme comfort.
IT Sports Directors Carl
McDonald, Graeme Langlands MBE and Steve Small have
an impressive combined knowledge of sport in Australia.
With 34 Tests for Australia and 195 goals Graeme
‘Changa’ Langlands MBE is a Rugby League Immortal. Small
is a NSW cricket legend having played and coached for
the blues. McDonald is actively involved with training
the Australian rugby sevens. McDonald and the other two
directors decided there was a need for an improved
compression tight that helped with performance and
recovery. The Directors of IT Sports approached NSWIS
Applied Research Program Director Kenneth Graham in 2006
for his advice with the design of their compression
tights. A number of NSWIS athletes were involved
development and trials. All are now advocates of the
garments and will be wearing them during the Australian
Olympic Team selection process and in Beijing if
selected.
See
more info on these products..... |
|
From Sport Victoria:
A series of injury prevention reports and fact
sheets, designed to reduce injuries and promote safe participation
in sport are available for a range of sports by contacting
Smartplay.
Recently Released fact sheets include:
Tackling Australian Football Injuries (PDF 1.44mb) is an example
of an injury prevention report. Additional reports are available
from
Smartplay and the
Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC).
Sports Ground Conditions and Injury Risk –
Implications for sports grounds assessment practices in Victoria
In 2005, the Sport and Recreation Victoria (SRV) portfolio of the
Department for Victorian Communities, commissioned a study to review
and evaluate issues relating to turf sports ground and surface
conditions and their possible relationship to sports safety. This
report presents the outcomes of this study which included a critical
review and evaluation of the standards and related guidelines and
practices currently used by turf-based sports and ground managers to
assess ground safety and injury risk, as well as an investigation of
the current evidence relating to relationships between ground
conditions and injury risk.
Sports Ground Conditions and Injury Risk Report - Full Report (PDF
1653 kb)
Sports Ground Conditions and Injury Risk Report - Appendices 2007
(PDF 604 kb)
A brief
summary of the research report (PDF 295 kb), outlining the
findings and recommendations from the study, together with
information on plans for further research into the relationships
between ground conditions and injury in community level Australian
Rules football is also available.
The good practice guidelines and checklists prepared by the
University of Ballart are available for download. Both MS WORD and
PDF versions of these checklists are provided and may copied and
customised by sport and local governments for use by local community
sports clubs.
Good Practice Match Day and Training Session Checklist (PDF 21 kb)
Good Practice Match Day and Training Session Checklist (Word 53 kb)
Good Practice Sports Ground Inspection Form (PDF 25 kb)
Good Practice Sports Ground Inspection Form (Word 72 kb)
Public Liability……….what’s going on?
(from
www.sport.act.gov.au
)
We have heard so many stories of spiralling insurance premiums, events
that have been cancelled and clubs that are staring down the barrel of
extinction, unable to afford, or even obtain insurance regardless of the cost.
Similarly, we have heard numerous public figures and industry leaders speak on
the issue, countless forums held to discuss “solutions” and no real answers
seeming to present itself. We have heard terms like “self insurance”, “risk
management”, “insurance pooling” and “group purchasing” thrown around with much
abandon.
While all this
discussion continues, the media continues to inform us, and many of us have
directly experienced, how the sport and recreation industry is being adversely
affected. Here in the ACT, we have not been immune to the public liability
crisis.
So what has caused this crisis?
The facts
are that we are currently faced with the confluence of two significant impacts –
a cyclical peak in the insurance market and rising cost of claims. These two
factors have largely driven the current crisis.
The insurance
market is currently in a ‘hard’ phase, characterised by reduced competition,
withdrawal of capital and the weeding out of poorly performing firms. For the
last 7 to 8 years, the Australian insurance industry has been highly
competitive, with insurance firms aggressively chasing market share. As a
result, underpricing of many of the liability products occurred.
In recent years returns from investment of premiums has declined, and
further exposed the underlying losses of these classes of insurance. Successive
losses by insurers, culminating in the demise of HIH have drastically reduced
competition and insurers are taking the opportunity to recover past losses. This
represents an example of the “hard phase” which was referred to earlier. HIH’s
underwriting practices, and in particular its aggressive underpricing, drove the
market down to unsustainable levels. HIH secured a large proportion of the
public liability market, which exacerbated the negative effects on business and
the community when the company eventually collapsed.
The Australian
prudential environment and market was incapable of detecting or halting the
destructive impacts of HIH’s practices because pertinent statistical information
was unavailable. That was, and remains, a Commonwealth responsibility.
The events of 11 September 2001
added to the distress already emerging in the Australian market from the “HIH
effect”. In particular, 11 September managed to remove 20 to 30% of available
capital in the world reinsurance market, with disastrous effects on capacity.
The tightening of the availability of capital has now translated into higher
premiums. It has also forced insurers to be more selective about the risks they
underwrite.
What is Government doing?
Government, both
at the Federal and State level, have been active in addressing this issue. An
initial meeting of Federal and State Ministers in March 2002 convened a national
working group to report on this issue, meeting again in May to receive their
report. Ministers made substantial progress on developing consistent national
approaches for implementing measures to tackle the problems of rising premiums
and reduced availability of public liability insurance. Ministers met with the
Insurance Council of Australia and chief executives of some major insurers and
made it clear that there is an expectation that the insurance industry will
deliver affordable public liability products to the community on the basis of
the reform package being implemented.
Ministers agreed
on a package of socially responsible initiatives aimed at reducing and
containing claims costs and increasing the transparency of insurance industry
practices through better data collection.
Tort Law Reform –
One of the initiatives is a review of the law of negligence.
The purpose of this review is to examine and report on reform options designed
to limit common law liability and quantum of damages arising from personal
injury or death. Further, the Federal Government has introduced alterations to
the Trade Practices Act to allow for self assumption of risk for people who
choose to participate in inherently risky activities, subject to the
preservation of adequate consumer protection.
Compensation Capping
– While there is no clear evidence to justify capping
in relation to the cost of claims, some jurisdictions favour applying damages
caps in relation to public liability claims. The ACT Government is
philosophically opposed to the watering down of individual rights to fair
compensation for injury and loss caused by the negligence of another party.
However, the community needs to understand that, in tackling the insurance
problem, a balance may have to be achieved between individual rights and holding
costs to a reasonable level to ensure preservation of our way of life and
fairness to all parties. While we may not wish to consider such a compromise,
the ACT is too small a market to stand alone.
Additionally, the
Government is considering clearing the way for structured payments within the
Australian compensation system. Court awards and compensations have been
traditionally being made by way of one lump sum. There is a concern that
dissipation of damages awards is occurring, pointing to victims losing their
funds, in some cases less than five years from date of receipt. Structured
settlement overcomes the dissipation problem by converting the lump sum to
periodic payments through an arrangement with a court-approved life company,
although modifications to taxation law would be required so that periodic
payments were no longer considered income and thus be considered tax free. The
Federal Government has introduced amendments to the Income Tax Assessment Act to
accommodate structured settlements.
Legal System Reforms
-
The Federal Government is considering a range of reforms to the legal
system to address the insurance crisis, including allowances for pre-litigation
exchanges of evidence to allow for increased preparation for a claims defence,
compulsory conferencing prior to the commencement of proceedings, and closer
scrutiny of “no win, no pay” legal practitioners.
What
specifically is happening in the ACT?
As well as being
involved in various forums and surveys at the national level, a range of
initiatives have been developed in the ACT to assist the sport and recreation
industry confront the insurance crisis
In June, the
Legislative Assembly passed the Duties (Insurance Exemptions) Amendment Act 2002
to assist not-for-profit sporting and community groups by excluding them from
paying duty on public liability insurance and any other general insurance
“prescribed” by the guidelines – these prescribed insurances being those
required to conduct public events. Whilst this Act does not solve the greater
problems that have caused this crisis, it does provide a level of relief for
aggrieved organisations.
Other proposals
are currently before Cabinet and these will be publicised as they are approved.
However, the Territory is committed to providing liability protection for
individual Volunteer/Good Samaritans, facilitating waivers for high-risk
activities, facilitating group insurance arrangements and risk advisory services
for local community, sporting and recreational groups.
The risk advisory service is under development at present. For those who need
immediate information about public liability insurance as it concerns their
relationship with the ACT Government, please call the insurance hotline (02)
6207 0184.
What
can the sport and recreation industry do?
Whilst it may seem
that the industry is helpless in dealing with this crisis, waiting for
Governments to step in and fix the problem, this is not the case as there are a
few basic things that organisations and individuals can do to help the
situation.
·
Education –
national surveys
have recognised that there is a lack of understanding by sports administrators,
coaches and officials about insurance and there requirements. The Australian and
New Zealand Sports Law Association recommends that organisations and individuals
be aware of exactly what insurance they current have, what it covers and for how
much, does it include any exclusions, what is the policy period, are there any
geographical limitations, and what is the excess payable in the event of a
claim?
·
Risk management –
It is essential
the organisations develop and implement a formal risk management plan to assist
in reducing the likelihood of accidents occurring. Ideally the risk management
plan should be developed by the National Sporting Organisation and have a flow
on effect to the state, association and club level. (Note the Risk Management
module being conducted by the Bureau as advertised in this edition of “Bureau
Links”)
·
Waivers –
A waiver or a
release is a contractual document that seeks to exclude the sporting
organisation from potential liability toward participants. A waiver is commonly
found on a membership or entry form where the individual is asked to waive any
right that they may have against the organiser in exchange for the opportunity
to participate.
Whilst a well
drafted waiver can effectively negate liability, they are not litigation
proof and their limitations must be acknowledged. Gross negligence cannot be
excluded by any contractual agreement and there exists a range of statutory
obligations under the Trade Practices Act (and state Fair Trading Acts) that
cannot be waived. Rigby Cooke Lawyers offer five tips for drafting of waivers;
1.
There must be an offer, inviting the participant to take part
in the activity or obtain membership services.
2.
The participant must agree to participate in the activity or
accept the offer of membership.
3.
Consideration must flow from the transaction, usually by
means of an entry or membership fee.
4.
The participant and the sporting organisation must intend to
enter into a legal relationship, evidenced by the terms of the entry form or
membership application.
5.
A participant under the age of 18 has no contractual capacity
and cannot enter into a legally binding agreement. However, having a minor and
their legal parent/guardian sign a waiver may be useful to demonstrate the
organisations attempt to bring the risks involved in participation to the
attention of the minor.
At time when we
work so hard to encourage the community to get out and be active, the last thing
that is needed is reduced physical activity opportunities or rising
participation costs that may convince an individual not to participate. Both
Government and the industry are addressing the issue, and whilst we will see
benefits from this work, it is unlikely that premiums will ever return to
pre-crisis levels.
|